The crime was eventually pinned on small-time crook Trevor Nash. When four years later, Nash made a brazen prison-escape attempt, he rose to notoriety as a kind of anti-establishment hero. But to this day uncertainty remains about whether Nash alone was responsible for the waterfront heist. Could he really-cunning as he was-have pulled it off all by himself? And what happened to the money?
Bainbridge's writing on this is almost forensic at times. He dives deeply into the case notes, mixes it with newspaper articles and even a few interviews. But better yet his delivery is far from dry. He uses a lot of the language of the day in his descriptions. He resurects long forgotten terminologies (used by insiders of the day). Terms like 'Soup Job' - the practice of cutting a hole in a safe with a acetylene torch to get at the contents.
![]() |
| The Northern Steamship Building which held the Waterfront Industry Commission Offices |
This setting was 1950's Auckland, conservative, yet divided along wealth and class lines, not quite colour, as Auckland didn't seem to have the demographic and ethnic mix that it has today. It also talks of a time, when the criminal fraternity in Auckland, if not New Zealand was "run", by colourful characters, mobsters, enforcers, powerful families, yet so far removed from the aggressive "drug", and gang culture crime of today.

